A Validation Study of Korean-version of Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side Effect Rating Scale (LUNSERS): Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side Effect Rating Scale (LUNSERS) / 신경정신의학
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
;
: 138-145, 2002.
Artigo
em Coreano
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-192413
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
This study was conducted to develop the Korean version of Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side Effect Rating Scale(LUNSERS) for measuring neuroleptic side effects by self-rating method and to examine the reliability and validity in the schizophrenic patients medicated by neuroleptics and normal controls.METHODS:
We made 51-item, 4-point scale of Korean version LUNSERS through translation, reverse translation and supervision by specialists. Sixty two schizophrenics diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria and medicated with neuroleptics completed LUNSERS twice with one week interval. Second LUNSERS and UKU side effect rating scale (UKU) by psychiatrist were administered to the schizophrenics at the same time. Normal controls also completed LUNSERS.RESULTS:
The test-retest reliability (r=0.86, p<0.01) of LUNSERS and the concurrent validity (r=0.81, p<0.001) against UKU were good. But the neuroleptic doses and total scores of side effect items didn't show significant correlation. By the ROC curve analysis, the total scores of side effect items differentiated the medicated patients from non-medicated controls but not for the red herring items.CONCLUSION:
Korean-version of LUNSERS has good reliability and validity. And it was also proved to be an useful assessment tool for measuring the extent of neuroleptic side effects systematically instead of UKU in clinical trials.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Organização e Administração
/
Psiquiatria
/
Especialização
/
Antipsicóticos
/
Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
/
Curva ROC
/
Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo prognóstico
Limite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Coreano
Revista:
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
Ano de publicação:
2002
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS