Histological comparison of endoscopic forceps biopsy with endoscopic mucosal resection in the gastric lesions / 대한내과학회지
Korean Journal of Medicine
; : 600-608, 2006.
Article
em Ko
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-193441
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The correct histological diagnosis of a gastric adenoma is important, because an adenoma has been reported to be a precancerous lesion and is associated with focal gastric carcinoma. However, there is some discrepancy between the histology of a forceps biopsy and that of the endoscopic mucosal resection. This study compared the histological findings of a gastric mucosal lesion in the specimens of a forceps biopsy and an endoscopic mucosal resection. METHODS: 88 cases of gastric mucosal lesions, which had been removed by the endoscopic mucosal resection, were reviewed retrospectively. All the patients had undergone a forceps biopsy before the endoscopic mucosal resection. The histological findings of the specimens by a forceps biopsy were compared with those by resection. RESULTS: The histological findings were accordant at 52 of the 88 cases (59.1%). Among the 71 cases with adenoma or gastritis in the biopsied specimens, 13 cases (18.3%) were finally diagnosed with gastric cancer in the resected specimens. Among all the gastritis and adenomas determined by the forceps biopsy, the high-risk groups for adenocarcinomas were characterized by the following endoscopic findings: red-colored and depressed lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Biopsy specimens may not be representative of the entire lesion. Therefore, an endoscopic resection of a gastric mucosal lesion is needed for making an accurate histological diagnosis and treatment if adenomas such as red-colored or depressed lesions are suspected.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Índice:
WPRIM
Assunto principal:
Neoplasias Gástricas
/
Instrumentos Cirúrgicos
/
Biópsia
/
Adenocarcinoma
/
Adenoma
/
Estudos Retrospectivos
/
Diagnóstico
/
Gastrite
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Observational_studies
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
Ko
Revista:
Korean Journal of Medicine
Ano de publicação:
2006
Tipo de documento:
Article