Comprehensive Application of the International Classification of Headache Disorders Third Edition, Beta Version
Journal of Korean Medical Science
;
: 106-113, 2016.
Artigo
em Inglês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-218583
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility and usefulness of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition, beta version (ICHD-3beta), and compare the differences with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, second edition (ICHD-2). Consecutive first-visit patients were recruited from 11 headache clinics in Korea. Headache classification was performed in accordance with ICHD-3beta. The characteristics of headaches were analyzed and the feasibility and usefulness of this version was assessed by the proportion of unclassified headache disorders compared with ICHD-2. A total of 1,627 patients were enrolled (mean age, 47.4±14.7 yr; 62.8% female). Classification by ICHD-3beta was achieved in 97.8% of headache patients, whereas 90.0% could be classified by ICHD-2. Primary headaches (n=1,429, 87.8%) were classified as follows 697 migraines, 445 tension-type headaches, 22 cluster headaches, and 265 other primary headache disorders. Secondary headache or painful cranial neuropathies/other facial pains were diagnosed in 163 patients (10.0%). Only 2.2% were not classified by ICHD-3beta. The main reasons for missing classifications were insufficient information (1.6%) or absence of suitable classification (0.6%). The diagnoses differed from those using ICHD-2 in 243 patients (14.9%). Among them, 165 patients were newly classified from unclassified with ICHD-2 because of the relaxation of the previous strict criteria or the introduction of a new diagnostic category. ICHD-3beta would yield a higher classification rate than its previous version, ICHD-2. ICHD-3beta is applicable in clinical practice for first-visit headache patients of a referral hospital.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Sistema de Registros
/
Estudos Transversais
/
Guias como Assunto
/
Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional
/
Transtornos da Cefaleia
/
República da Coreia
/
Transtornos de Enxaqueca
Tipo de estudo:
Guia de Prática Clínica
/
Estudo observacional
/
Estudo de prevalência
/
Fatores de risco
Limite:
Adulto
/
Idoso
/
Aged80
/
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
País/Região como assunto:
Ásia
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Ano de publicação:
2016
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS