Comparison between immunofluorescence and PCR in detecting human papilloma virus in condyloma acuminata / 中国医学科学杂志(英文版)
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal
;
(4): 125-127, 2006.
Artigo
em Inglês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-243603
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the effectiveness of immunofluorescence and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in detecting human papilloma virus (HPV) in condyloma acuminata (CA).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>HPVs in CA tissues from 60 patients were detected by immunofluorescence and PCR, respectively. Different subtypes of HPVs were also identified with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The positive detective rates of immunofluorescence and PCR were 56.67% (34/60) and 96.67% (58/ 60), respectively (P < 0.01). RFLP results showed HPV6 and HPV11 were the main subtypes in the detected virus, which accounted for 98.28%.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The sensibility of PCR is superior to that of immunofluorescence.</p>
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Virologia
/
Condiloma Acuminado
/
Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase
/
Papillomavirus Humano 6
/
Papillomavirus Humano 11
/
Genética
/
Microscopia de Fluorescência
Limite:
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal
Ano de publicação:
2006
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS