Comparison of laparoscope-assisted D2 radical total gastrectomy and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer / 中华胃肠外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
; (12): 781-784, 2014.
Article
em Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-254417
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the clinical feasibility of laparoscope-assisted D2 radical total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From March 2011 to March 2013, 216 gastric cancer patients underwent D2 radical total gastrectomy in our hospital, including 118 laparoscopic and 98 open procedures. The intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between the two groups were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared with open surgery group, laparoscopic group had longer operation time [(253.9 ± 26.1) min vs. (206.2 ± 23.9) min, P<0.01], less intraoperative blood loss [(138.4 ± 34.0) ml vs. (266.3 ± 58.7) ml, P<0.01], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(10.3 ± 1.4) d vs. (13.9 ± 2.0) d, P<0.01], and lower morbidity of postoperative complication [16.1% (19/118) vs. 29.6% (29/98), P<0.05]. There were no significant differences in the number of lymph node removed [(26.2 ± 6.2 vs. 27.6 ± 5.6)], postoperative morbidity of complication [1.7% (2/118) vs. 2.0% (2/98)], and 2-year survival rate(99.0% vs. 98.6%) between the two groups (all P>0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>As compared to open surgery, laparoscope-assisted D2 radical total gastrectomy is safe, feasible with the advantage of rapid postoperative recovery.</p>
Texto completo:
1
Índice:
WPRIM
Assunto principal:
Neoplasias Gástricas
/
Cirurgia Geral
/
Estudos Retrospectivos
/
Resultado do Tratamento
/
Laparoscopia
/
Gastrectomia
/
Laparotomia
/
Métodos
Tipo de estudo:
Observational_studies
Limite:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Ano de publicação:
2014
Tipo de documento:
Article