Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bacteriology study of hypospadias / 中华整形外科杂志
Article em Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-255105
Biblioteca responsável: WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>This clinical study was to explore why the neo-urethra is liable to be infected after hypospadias operation, find the source and the common floras of infection, and accordingly, improve the peroperation procedures so as to reduce postoperative infection rate.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The pathogenic floras were examined and analyzed by germiculture and karyotype analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The bacteria in the neo-urethra mostly came from the orifice and the reconstruction material of the urethra. The most common floras that caused infection were gram-positive coccus. The most sensitive antibiotics for hypospadias infection were demethylvancomycin.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The postoperative infection of hypospadias is incisional, not the urinary system infection. Because the microenvironment of the neo-urethra is more suitable for infection than that of the skin or mucosa, the reconstructed urethra is likely to be infected.</p>
Assuntos
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Assunto principal: Período Pós-Operatório / Cirurgia Geral / Uretra / Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana / Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana / Classificação / Bactérias Gram-Positivas / Hipospadia / Microbiologia Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: Zh Revista: Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery Ano de publicação: 2005 Tipo de documento: Article
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Assunto principal: Período Pós-Operatório / Cirurgia Geral / Uretra / Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana / Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana / Classificação / Bactérias Gram-Positivas / Hipospadia / Microbiologia Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: Zh Revista: Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery Ano de publicação: 2005 Tipo de documento: Article