A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled, multicenter study of entecavir maleate versus entecavir for treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: results at week 48 / 中华肝脏病杂志

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of entecavir (ETV) maleate versus ETV in Chinese patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled, multicenter study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 48 weeks of treatment with 0.5 mg/day ETV (group A; n = 26) or 0.5 mg/day ETV maleate (n = 31). Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were measured at weeks 12, 24, and 48 by the Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Taqman PCR assay. Adverse events (AE) were recorded.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. At weeks 12, 24, and 48, the mean HBV DNA level had similarly decreased from baseline in both groups (A by 4.24, 4.61 and 4.88 log10 IU/mL vs. B 4.01, 4.50 and 4.99 log10 IU/mL, respectively; all P more than 0.05). Patients who achieved undetectable levels of serum HBV DNA (less than 20 IU/mL) at week 48 were similar in the two groups (A 69.23% vs. B 80.65%; P more than 0.05). Both groups achieved similar normalization of ALT at week 48 (A 96.00% vs. B 83.87%; P more than 0.05). The overall AE incidence was similar for the two groups (A 22.22% vs. B 9.38%; P more than 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Entecavir maleate and entecavir showed similar efficacy and safety in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB.</p>