Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Different approaches to revascularization for complex coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: analysis of perioperative outcomes / 南方医科大学学报
Journal of Southern Medical University ; (12): 327-331, 2016.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-264046
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the perioperative outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for treatment of complex coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.</p><p><b>METHDOS</b>The clinical data of 966 patients admitted to our hospital from January 2003 to December 2013 with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤50%) were retrospectively reviewed. Among the patients, 386 underwent CABG and 580 received PCI. After matching for EuroSCORE risk factors and preoperative echocardiographic parameters, 135 patients with CABG and 135 with PCI were enrolled in this study. With hospital mortality and perioperative major complications as the endpoints, the early outcomes of the procedures were evaluated. Perioperative echocardiography was performed to evaluate the change of left ventricular geometry and function.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared with CABG group, PCI group had significantly higher incidences of chronic lung disease (8.1% vs 0.7%, P=0.003) and recent myocardial infarction (64.4% vs 31.9%, P=0.000) but significantly lower left-main disease (12.6% vs 23.7%, P=0.018); the other baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Patients with CABG had a greater number of treated target vessels than those with PCI (2.90±0.81 vs 1.67±0.73, P=0.000), and complete revascularization was more common in CABG group (94.8% vs 51.8%, P=0.000). No significant difference was found in perioperative variations of LVEF between the two groups, but patients with CABG had a greater variation in LVEDD than those with PCI. The hospital mortality and other major complications were similar between the two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Both CABG and PCI are safe and reliable revascularization strategies for complex coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction, but CABG can achieve a higher rate of complete revascularization and better improves the left ventricular function.</p>
Assuntos
Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Cirurgia Geral / Terapêutica / Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Ecocardiografia / Ponte de Artéria Coronária / Incidência / Estudos Retrospectivos / Fatores de Risco / Função Ventricular Esquerda / Resultado do Tratamento Tipo de estudo: Estudo de etiologia / Estudo de incidência / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Fatores de risco Limite: Humanos Idioma: Chinês Revista: Journal of Southern Medical University Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Cirurgia Geral / Terapêutica / Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Ecocardiografia / Ponte de Artéria Coronária / Incidência / Estudos Retrospectivos / Fatores de Risco / Função Ventricular Esquerda / Resultado do Tratamento Tipo de estudo: Estudo de etiologia / Estudo de incidência / Estudo observacional / Estudo prognóstico / Fatores de risco Limite: Humanos Idioma: Chinês Revista: Journal of Southern Medical University Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Artigo