Endovascular intervention versus traditional bypass for treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome / 中华外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Surgery
;
(12): 423-426, 2002.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-264804
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To retrospectively compare combined endovascular intervension with traditional bypass operation for the treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From July 1989 to June 2001, 49 patients undergoing surgery for BCS were studied. 32 operations were performed by traditional bypass (from superior mesenteric vein or inferior vena cava to right auricle), and 17 by combined endovascular operation.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The data demonstrated a high incidence of perioperative complications, longer hospital stay, and expensive cost in the former group than in the latter group (P < 0.01). The mid-term effects were significantly better in the latter than in the former (P < 0.05). Severe complications occurred in the bypass group included hepatoencephalopathy, obtinacy ascites, cardiac dysfunction, and embolization of vascular grafts.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Combined endovascular intervention and shunting are the treatment of choice for BCS, with different combination according to its clinical type. This approach is simple, safe, effective, and economic.</p>
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Cirurgia Geral
/
Veia Cava Inferior
/
Seguimentos
/
Síndrome de Budd-Chiari
/
Complicações Intraoperatórias
/
Tempo de Internação
/
Veias Mesentéricas
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo observacional
/
Estudo prognóstico
Limite:
Adulto
/
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Surgery
Ano de publicação:
2002
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS