Comparison of cost-effectiveness between Urimem and direct freezing for urinary protein preservation / 生物工程学报
Chinese Journal of Biotechnology
;
(12): 1128-1133, 2014.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-279441
ABSTRACT
To compare two enrichment and preservation methods of urinary proteins, stored in polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Urimem) or direct freezing, we examined the differences between the two methods in time, space, costs of supplies and electricity, degree of protein degradation and convenience of the sample handling. The urimem method is superior in the storage space, the cost of electricity and the clinical convenience compared to the direct freezing method. However, the direct freezing method is superior in the time and the cost of supplies to the urimem method. The enrichment and preservation of urinary proteins using urimem have more cost-effective benefits compared to those of the direct freezing method.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Polivinil
/
Preservação Biológica
/
Urina
/
Proteínas
/
Química
/
Análise Custo-Benefício
/
Congelamento
/
Métodos
Tipo de estudo:
Avaliação Econômica em Saúde
Limite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Biotechnology
Ano de publicação:
2014
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS