Comparison of efficacy between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and open hemorrhoidectomy / 中华胃肠外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
;
(12): 241-243, 2006.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-283347
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the results of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and open hemorrhoidectomy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A standard questionnaire was given to all patients after PPH or open hemorrhoidectomy from March 2001 to March 2004. In combination with proctological examination, the results including symptoms relief and recurrence were compared between the two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were 184 effective questionnaires, including 96 cases in PPH group and 88 in open hemorrhoidectomy group. PPH and open hemorrhoidectomy both relieved prolapse (92.7% vs 96.8%, P=0.282), bleeding (91% vs 81%, P=0.241) and pain (91.7% vs 91.5%, P=0.977). There were no statistical differences in the overall complication rate (30.2% and 29.5%, P=0.923) and recurrence rate (21.8% vs 20.5%, P=0.814) between the two groups. The overall satisfactory degree was 87.5% in PPH group and 84.8% in open hemorrhoidectomy group (P=0.218).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>PPH is a safe and effective option for prolapsed hemorrhoids compared with open hemorrhoidectomy.</p>
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Cirurgia Geral
/
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório
/
Inquéritos e Questionários
/
Resultado do Tratamento
/
Hemorroidas
/
Métodos
Limite:
Adulto
/
Idoso
/
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Ano de publicação:
2006
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS