Prospective randomised study of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: comparison between external fixation and plate fixation

ABSTRACT

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Intra-articular fractures of the distal radius represent high energy, complex, unstable injuries and the optimal method of treatment remains controversial.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>The aim of the paper is to compare the outcomes of external fixation (EF) with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and screw fixation in the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius. Thirty-five patients were enlisted from December 2003 to September 2005 after a failure of initial conservative treatment. The patients were randomised into EF or ORIF groups. The patients were followed-up at 1 week, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical and radiological outcomes were measured. They were scored using the Green and O'Brien or the Gartland and Wertley score.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of the 35 patients, 5 defaulted the 6-month follow-up and were excluded. We found that the clinical and radiological outcomes for the 2 groups were not significantly different. Complication rates were also similar.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>There is no significant difference in the outcome of intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with either EF or ORIF.</p>