A Comparison of Obstetric and Non-obstetric Anesthesia Medical Accidents / 대한마취과학회지
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
;
: 431-436, 2008.
Artigo
em Coreano
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-29994
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Obstetrics departments are unique and medical accidents in obstetric anesthesia may show differences from non-obstetric anesthesia accidents.So we compared both groups in several aspects for the understanding their characters and decreasing their incidence.METHODS:
Obstetric anesthesia accidents (n = 30) and non-obstetric anesthesia accidents (n = 106) were compared in 6 categories (patient age, anesthesia method, damaging event, anesthetic care, severity of injury, payment).RESULTS:
The most common complications in obstetric anesthesia accidents were maternal death (40%), maternal brain damage (13%), and maternal nerve injury (13%).In contrast, the most common complications in non-obstetric anesthesia accidents were patient death (62%), and patient brain damage (27%). The severity of injury score of obstetric anesthesia adverse outcomes was analogous to that of non-obstetric anesthesia adverse outcomes, but the payment for obstetric accidents was significantly greater than that for non-obstetric accidents.CONCLUSIONS:
Obstetric anesthesia accidents revealed distinct medical risk profiles, such as patient age, damaging event, severity of injury, and payment.Special care should be used when anesthetizing younger women and caring for a newborn in obstetric anesthesia.More studies and analyses are necessary to prevent obstetric anesthesia accidents.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Unidade Hospitalar de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
/
Encéfalo
/
Morte Materna
/
Anestesia
/
Anestesia Obstétrica
Limite:
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Recém-Nascido
Idioma:
Coreano
Revista:
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Ano de publicação:
2008
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS