Endoscopic thyroid surgery: a comparison of the trans-subclavian and the trans-areolar approach / 中华外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Surgery
;
(12): 1044-1046, 2006.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-300562
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the advantages and shortcomings of the endoscopic thyroid surgery by trans-subclavian approach and trans-areolar approach.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Twelve patients received the trans-areolar approach and 10 patients were given the trans-subclavian approach procedure.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>With the trans-areolar approach:
the mean size of tumor was 1.8 cm, the mean operating time was 115 min, the mean blood loss during operation was 63 ml. Two patients converted to the conventional operation. With the trans-subclavian procedure the mean size of tumor was 4.2 cm, the mean operating time was 85 min, the mean blood loss during operation was 66 ml. No complications were found in all of the patients and they were satisfied with the cosmetic effects of the procedures. There were significant differences in tumor size and operating time between the two operation types.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Compared with the trans-areolar approach, the trans-subclavian approach comes with less trauma, higher success rate and it fits for bigger tumor.</p>
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Cirurgia Geral
/
Tireoidectomia
/
Estudos Retrospectivos
/
Resultado do Tratamento
/
Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide
/
Endoscopia
/
Métodos
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo observacional
Limite:
Adulto
/
Idoso
/
Humanos
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Surgery
Ano de publicação:
2006
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS