Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for the management of prostate cancer / 中华男科学杂志
National Journal of Andrology
;
(12): 1106-1109, 2015.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-304766
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in the treatment of prostate cancer and investigate the clinical application value of RLRP.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We retrospectively analyzed 70 cases of prostate cancer treated by RALRP and another 32 cases treated by LRP. We compared the operation time, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, catheter-indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, incisal margin positive rate, biochemical recurrence, and normal postoperative urinary continence and penile erectile function between the two groups of patients.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All the operations were successfully accomplished. RALRP exhibited a significant superiority over LRP in intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, catheter-indwelling time, and postoperative hospital stay, urinary continence and erectile function (P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, with its advantages of few postoperative complications and well-preserved urinary continence and penile erectile function, is an effective, safe and minimally invasive surgical option for prostate cancer.</p>
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Complicações Pós-Operatórias
/
Período Pós-Operatório
/
Prostatectomia
/
Neoplasias da Próstata
/
Cirurgia Geral
/
Ereção Peniana
/
Estudos Retrospectivos
/
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica
/
Laparoscopia
/
Duração da Cirurgia
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo observacional
Limite:
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
National Journal of Andrology
Ano de publicação:
2015
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS