TUBVP and HOLEP: desirable surgical options for large benign prostatic hyperplasia ( >80 ml) / 中华男科学杂志
National Journal of Andrology
;
(12): 907-910, 2008.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-309750
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the safety and efficacy of the two surgical alternatives, transurethral bipolar vaporization resection of the prostate (TUBVP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP), in the treatment of large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Retrospective analyses were made of 56 cases of large BPH ( >80 ml), 34 treated by TUBVP with the Bipolar Vaporization System (ACMI Medical Ltd, U.K.) at 160 W in cutting and 80 W in coagulation mode, and 22 by HOLEP with the Holmium Laser System (LUMNIS Ltd, US) at 100W. The safety and efficacy of the two approaches were assessed based on the operative and follow-up data.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Blood loss was significantly less in the HOLEP than in the TUBVP group ( P < 0.01), but the time of postoperative bladder irrigation and catheter indwelling was obviously shorter in the latter. IPSS, Qmax and Residual unine were markedly improved at 1 and 3 months after the surgery, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Both TUBVP and HOLEP are safe and effective surgical options for the treatment of large BPH. Particularly the former, easier to be popularly applied, is promising to be a new "gold standard" in the surgical treatment of BPH.</p>
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Patologia
/
Próstata
/
Hiperplasia Prostática
/
Cirurgia Geral
/
Estudos Retrospectivos
/
Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata
/
Usos Terapêuticos
/
Lasers de Estado Sólido
/
Métodos
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo observacional
Limite:
Idoso
/
Aged80
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
National Journal of Andrology
Ano de publicação:
2008
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS