Bowel preparation with sodium phosphate versus polyethylene glycol: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial / 中华胃肠外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
;
(12): 178-181, 2009.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-326532
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the efficacy, tolerance and safety between oral sodium phosphate(NaP) and polyethylene glycol(PEG) on bowel preparation.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>One hundred and fifteen inpatients were randomly divided into NaP group and PEG group. The questionnaire was designed for scoring by patients and doctors regarding to tolerance, taste, side effects and cleaning degree etc.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared with PEG group, NaP presented better tolerance, lower side effects and higher rate of adequate cleaning quality(P<0.05). NaP could cause electrolytic alterations, such as hyperphosphatemia, hypernatremia, hypocalcemia and hypopotassemia, but these changes were transient and without clinical significance.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Sodium phosphate is safe and effective for bowel preparation, and is better than polyethylene glycol in tolerance.</p>
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Fosfatos
/
Polietilenoglicóis
/
Cuidados Pré-Operatórios
/
Administração Oral
/
Estudos Prospectivos
/
Usos Terapêuticos
/
Métodos
Tipo de estudo:
Ensaio Clínico Controlado
/
Estudo observacional
Limite:
Adolescente
/
Adulto
/
Idoso
/
Aged80
/
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Ano de publicação:
2009
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS