A comparative study of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus pure laparoscopic major hepatectom / 南方医科大学学报
Journal of Southern Medical University
;
(12): 1676-1679, 2014.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-329223
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic liver surgery (HALS) and pure laparoscopic liver surgery (PLS).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical data were analyzed for 64 patients undergoing major hepatectomy with HALH (23 cases) and PLS (41 cases) between January, 2010 and December, 2012.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The general data of the two groups were comparable. Compared with PLS, HALS was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (240 vs 191 min), less intraoperative blood loss (430 vs 220 ml, P<0.05), and a lower cost (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative hospital stay, complication rates or recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>HALS is safe for major liver resection with such advantages over PLS as causing less trauma and a lower cost.</p>
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Cirurgia Geral
/
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica
/
Laparoscopia
/
Carcinoma Hepatocelular
/
Hepatectomia
/
Tempo de Internação
/
Neoplasias Hepáticas
/
Métodos
/
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia
Limite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Journal of Southern Medical University
Ano de publicação:
2014
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS