Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy on analgesia with electric stimulation of long-term retaining needle after laparoscopic cholecystectomy / 中国针灸
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion ; (12): 169-172, 2014.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-337244
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe the clinical effect of electric stimulation of long-term retaining needle on analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and the impacts on the post-surgical flatus time.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Under static absorptive composite general anesthesia, 90 cases of LC were randomized into three groups, 30 cases in each one. In the control group, the analgesia was not applied after LC. In the analgesia-pumper group, the patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was used. In the needle-retaining group, the electric acupuncture stimulator was used. The needles were inserted transversely at Riyue (GB 24), Qichong (ST 30) and Yanglingquan (GB 34) and fixed with sterile sticker. Separately, in 8 h and 24 h after surgery, the electric acupuncture stimulation with disperse-dense wave, 2 Hz/100 Hz frequency was applied continuously for 30 min. Visual analogue scale (VAS), adverse reactions such as vomiting and nausea and the postoperative flatus time in 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 36 h after surgery were observed and recorded in the three groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after surgery, VAS scores in the needle-retaining group and the analgesia-pumper group were all lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). The analgesia effect at the above time points in the needle-retaining group was better than that in the analgesia-pumper group (all P < 0.05). There was not adverse reaction in the needle-retaining group. But there were 3 cases of somnolence, 6 cases of nausea and 3 cases of vomiting in the analgesia-pumper group, and 2 cases of nausea and 1 case of vomiting in the control group. The flatus time was quite earlier in the needle-retaining group as compared with the other two groups [(14.77 +/- 4.99) h vs (18.50 +/- 4.22) h, P < 0.01; (14.77 +/- 4.99) h vs (18.17 +/- 4.69) h, P < 0.05].</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The electric stimulation of long-term retaining needle is safe and effective in analgesia after LC. It avoids the adverse reactions of analgesics and promotes postoperative flatus.</p>
Assuntos
Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Terapêutica / Analgesia por Acupuntura / Eletroacupuntura / Colecistectomia Laparoscópica / Manejo da Dor Tipo de estudo: Ensaio Clínico Controlado Limite: Adulto / Idoso / Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Terapêutica / Analgesia por Acupuntura / Eletroacupuntura / Colecistectomia Laparoscópica / Manejo da Dor Tipo de estudo: Ensaio Clínico Controlado Limite: Adulto / Idoso / Feminino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Artigo