A comparative analysis of neonatal critical illness score and score for neonatal acute physiology, perinatal extension, version II / 中国当代儿科杂志
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics
;
(12): 342-345, 2017.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-351348
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the accuracy and clinical utility of neonatal critical illness score (NCIS) and score for neonatal acute physiology, perinatal extension, version II (SNAPPE-II) in predicting the "dead and abandoned" risk in critically ill neonates.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 269 critically ill neonates were divided into two groups according to their prognosis dead/abandoned and improved/cured. The accuracy of these two scoring systems, NCIS and SNAPPE-II, in predicting the "dead and abandoned" risk was compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The dead/abandoned group had a significantly higher SNAPPE-II score than the improved/cured group (P<0.001), while there was no significant difference in the NCIS score between the two groups (P=0.091). The children who were in line with the individual indicator in the NCIS results had a significantly higher "dead and abandoned" risk than those who were not (P=0.005).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>SNAPPE-II is more accurate in early prediction of the "dead and abandoned" risk in critically ill neonates compared with NCIS. NCIS has the ability to predict the "dead and abandoned" risk in children in line with the individual indicator.</p>
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Fisiologia
/
Índice de Gravidade de Doença
/
Estudos Retrospectivos
/
Estado Terminal
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo observacional
/
Estudo prognóstico
Limite:
Feminino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
/
Recém-Nascido
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics
Ano de publicação:
2017
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS