Antagonizing with Flumazenil after Sedation with Midazolam in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy / 日本農村医学会雑誌

ABSTRACT

We investigated the usefulness of the method of producing sedation with midazolam and reversing with antagonist flumazenil in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Twenty-five adult outpatients underwent diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy 3 min after having an intravenous injection of 5 mg of midazolam for sedation, and received 0.25 mg of flumazenil intravenously 5 min after the removal of the endoscope. Blood pressure, heart rate, and percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured, recorded, and compared at nine points 1 min before midazolam injection, 2 min after midazolam injection, 1, 3, and 5 min after the insertion of the endoscope, 1 and 3 min after the removal of the endoscope, 1 min after flumazenil injection, and their awakening time at which they are easily able to respond to verbal commands. Fifteen minntes after their awakening, we asked those patients about their memory during the endoscopy and evaluated their pain with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A significant decrease in systolic blood pressure was noted 2 min after midazolam injection. But the systolic blood pressure measured 1 min after the insertion of the endoscope significantly increased when compared with the level 2 min after midazolam injection. Then it gradually started decreasing. Although the systolic blood pressures 1 min after flumazenil injection and at their awakening time increased slightly, the levels were significantly lower than those 1 min before midazolam injection. The heart rate increased to the maximum 1 min after the insertion of the endoscope. Then it gradually started decreasing. The heart rates 1 min after flumazenil injection and at their awakening time decreased significantly when compared with those 1 min after the insertion of the endoscope. SpO2 significantly decreased from 97.6±1.6% 1 min before midazolam injection to 95.7±2.5% 2 min after midazolam injection and remained depressing around 95% during the endoscopy. However, SpO2 recovered 96.6±2.0% at their awakening time. Two patients had a vague memory but all the rest had no memory recollection at all of what happened during the examination. VAS was 20 mm for one patient and 0 mm for another patient. We showed the clinical usefulness of the method of antagonizing with flumazenil after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed on patients given an i.v. injection of midazolam, because this method might provide a minimal circulatory change due to some protection against hemodynamics stress in response to manipulation of the endoscope, anterograde amnesia, and disappearance of pain. However, we should take care of respiratory depression of the patient during endoscopy.