Study on correlation between red cell distribution width and inflammatory bowel disease activity / 中华检验医学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the correlation between RDW and disease activity in patients with IBD and evaluate clinical significance of RDW as a potential indicator to monitor IBD activity. Methods 256 patients with IBD were divided into two groups. One was UC group including 136 patients with 80 active period cases and 56 emission period cases. Another was CD group including 120 patients with 75 active period cases and 45 emission period cases. 60 bacillary dysentery diseases and 80 healthy controls were selected as bacillary dysentery group and healthy control group. RDW, Hb, WBC, PLT, CRP, ESR, MCV were tested and monitored with development of disease at different stages. We compared RDW with CRP,ESR, PLT, Hb, MCV parameters. By ROC curve analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of RDW was estimated in identifying the IBD's activity. Results The mean values of RDW in active UC group, remission UC group, bacillary dysentery group and control group were ( 16. 1 ± 2. 7), ( 13.5 ± 2. 1 ), ( 13.0 ± 2. 0)and ( 12. 8 ± 1.8), respectively. There was significant difference among four groups ( F = 51.9, P < 0. 01 ).RDW in active UC group was significant higher than that in remission UC group, bacillary dysentery group and healthy control group ( t = 8. 12, 9. 67, 11.85, P < 0.05) and RDW in remission UC group was significant higher than that in bacillary dysentery group and healthy control group as well ( t = 2. 45, 2. 67,P <0. 05). The mean values of RDW in active CD group, remissive CD group,bacillary dysentery group and control group were ( 16. 9 ± 2. 2 ), ( 13. 8 ± 1.1 ), ( 13.0 ± 2. 0), ( 12. 8 ± 1.8 ). There was significant difference among four groups ( F = 113.9, P < 0. 01 ). RDW in the active CD group was significant higher than that in remission CD group, bacillary dysentery group and healthy control group (t = 11.47,18.63,18. 72, P < 0. 05 ) and RDW in remission CD group was also significant higher than that in bacillary dysentery group and healthy control group ( t = 3.60, 3. 72, P < 0. 05 ). RDW in UC and CD groups demonstrated a positive correlation with CRP and ESR (r=0. 484, 0. 525, 0. 286, 0. 358 and P<0. 01, <0. 01, < 0. 05, < 0. 01, respectively) but an inverse correlation with Hb and MCV (r = -0. 378, -0. 271,- 0. 329, - 0. 298 and P < 0. 01, < 0. 01, < 0. 05, < 0. 01, respectively). In UC groups RDW represented a larger area under ROC curve (0. 8.54) compared with CRP, ESR, PLT, Fib and MCV. When the cut-off value of RDW was 14. 0, the sensitivity and specificity for identifying active UC were 82% (65/80) and 72% (40/56) respectively. In CD groups, the area of RDW under ROC curve was the largest (0. 925 )among all indicators. When the cut-off of RDW was 14.5, the sensitivity and specificity for identifying active CD was 88% (66/75) and 82% (37/45) respectively. Conclusion RDW in patients with IBD is a useful indicator to estimate the IBD activity and predict disease progression.