Comparison of Outcomes of Standard and Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery / 한국유방암학회지
Journal of Breast Cancer
;
: 193-197, 2013.
Artigo
em Inglês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-38438
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
The aim of this study is to determine and to compare the oncological outcomes of bilateral reduction mammoplasty to standard breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.METHODS:
One hundred sixty-two patients who received a quadrantectomy because of breast cancer (group 1) and 106 breast cancer patients with macromastia who underwent breast-conserving surgery via bilateral reduction mammoplasty (group 2) between 2003 and 2010 were enrolled in this study.RESULTS:
The mean follow-up time was 37 months for group 1 and 33 months for group 2. Surgical margins were wider than 2 mm in 82.7% and 10 mm in 76.5% of the patients in group 1. Eleven percent of patients had positive surgical margins in this group. When compared to group 2, the rates were 89%, 84%, and 8.4%, respectively. Three patients (1.8%) in group 1 and one patient (0.9%) in group 2 had local recurrence of the disease and received a mastectomy. No statistical significances were noted for either local recurrence or overall survival between the two groups.CONCLUSION:
Bilateral reduction mammoplasty has some advantages as compared to the standard conventional breast-conserving surgery techniques without having any unfavorable effects on surgical margin confidence, local recurrence, and survival rates.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Assunto principal:
Recidiva
/
Mama
/
Neoplasias da Mama
/
Mastectomia Segmentar
/
Taxa de Sobrevida
/
Seguimentos
/
Mamoplastia
/
Hipertrofia
/
Mastectomia
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo observacional
/
Estudo prognóstico
Limite:
Feminino
/
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglês
Revista:
Journal of Breast Cancer
Ano de publicação:
2013
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS