A comparative study on biomechanical results of posterior mono-segment pedide instrumentationand its combination with bone cement fixation for management of thoracolumbar fractures / 中华创伤杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the biomechanical properties of mono-segTnent pedicle instru-mentation and its combination with bone cement fixation in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Meth-ods Eight fresh specimens of calf spines ( T11 -L3 ) were used for development of incomplete burst frac-ture models at the vertebral body of L1. Mono-segment pedicle instrumentation and its combination with vertebroplasty were respectively applied in each specimen subsequently to restore spinal stability. A cyclic loading with pure moment of 4 Nm was applied to specimens, with load frequency of 0.5 Hz for 2 000 cy-cles. Range of motion (ROM) at flexion/extension, left/right lateral bending and left/right axial rotation of the fixated segment at different status of intact, injury, fixation and cyclic loading was determined by spinal three-dimensional instability test system. Results ROM after treatment with two fixation tech-niques and that at different directions after cyclic loading were distinctly smaller than that of intact and fractured models (P <0.05 ). Under mono-segment pedicle instrumentation combined with bone cement fixation, ROM at flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation was 0.40°, 0. 53°, 0.86° and 0.55° respectively and that after cyclic loading was 0.10°, 0.07°, 0.19° and 0.08°respectively, which were all lower than those of monosegmental fixation, especially at flexion and axial rotation, with statisti-cal difference (P <0.05 ). Conclusions Both fixation techniques can provide instant stabihty of the fractured spine and have good fatigue resistance effect. However, mono-segment pedicle instrumentation is inferior to mono-segment pedicle instrumentation plus bone cement fixation in treatment of fractured verte-bral body at flexion and axial rotation.