Biomechanical analysis of two fixation methods in treating spine fracture and dislocation / 中国组织工程研究
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
;
(53): 10279-10282, 2009.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-404361
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Thoracic or lumbar spine fracture and dislocation mainly treated by internal/external fixation devices with surgical methods.Fixation methods in treating spine fracture and dislocation is an important subject for scholars.OBJECTIVE:
To quantitative analyze the treatment of spinal fracture and dislocation using pedicle screw and plate fixation,and to provide mechanical parameters for clinical application.METHODS:
Shimadzu electronic universal testing machine was used to simulate L_1 lumbar fracture and dislocation treated by plate fixation and pedicle screw fixations,specimens were underwent flexion,extension,compression,as well as torsion tests,with speed of 5 mm/min.The torsion test was performed on the torsion machine with speed of 0.05 (°) / s.All the experimental data were analyzed by statistical analysis and paired t test.RESULTS ANDCONCLUSION:
The results demonstrated that the outcomes of compression test had no significant differences between 2 groups (P>0.05).The left and right torsion angle of the pedicle screw fixation group was smaller than that of the plate fixation group (P<0.05),and the flexion and extension displacements was smaller in the pedicle screw fixation group than in the plate fixation group (P<0.05).It suggested that plate fixation is worse than pedicle screw fixation,while pedicle screw fixation is conductive to bone healing,thus,pedicle screw fixation is a better internal fixation device.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Ano de publicação:
2009
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS