Clinical outcome of cervical disc replacement and adjacent cage fusion for multi-segmental cervical disc herniation / 中华创伤杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the clinical outcome of artificial cervical disc replacement and cage fusion in the treatment of multi-segmental cervical disc herniation. Methods A total of 39 patients with multi-level cervical disc herniation were treated with disc replacement and adjacent segment cage fusion at one stage. There were 29 patients with two level cervical disc herniation, nine with three level cervical disc herniation and one with four level cervical disc herniation. Of the patients, there were 17 male and 22 female, aged between 35 and 63 years ( mean age 47 years). The herniated disc was located at C3-4 and C4-5 in two patients, C4-5 and C5-6 in 15, C5-6 and C6-7 in nine, C4-5 and C6-7 in three, C3-4,C4-5 and C5-6 in four, C4-5, C5-6 and C6-7 in five and C3-4, C4-8 , C5-6 and C6-7 in one. There were 18 patients with myelopathy and 21 with radieulopathy. The stabilization and the range of motion of implanted disc,the fusion of cage and the displacement of cage were observed on dynamic radiograph postoperatively. The clinical symptom and the neurological function were evaluated according to JOA score and odom' s criteria. Postoperative clinical symptoms and daily function were evaluated by using neck disability index (NDI) scale. Results Twenty-nine patients with bi-level cervical disc herniation underwent single level disc replacement and cage fusion on adjacent segment. Nine patients with three level disc herniation underwent single level disc replacement in seven and level cage fusion on adjacent segment in two. Twopatients underwent two level disc replacement and one level cage fusion. One patient with four level disc herniation was treated with two level disc replacement and two level cage fusion. The patients were followed up for from 6 moths to 3 years, which showed that definite stabilization was achieved for all disc with average range of motion for 9.3 degrees postoperatively. Solid fusion was achieved in all cage, with no subsidence or displacement of cage. The JOA score was increased from 9.1 to 13.2 at final follow up and the NDI (neck disability index) score decreased from 41.8 reduced to 29.5 at final follow up. The clinical success rate (excellent/good/fair) according to Odom' s Criteria was 85%. Conclusion Cervical disc replacement and cage fusion can attain definite stabilization and satisfactory mobility and provide a new effective treatment for cervical disc herniation. The long-term outcome needs further clinical followup.