Light-dark box as a model of state anxiety in Kunming mice: test-retest reliability and correlations between parameters / 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
; (12): 198-201, 2011.
Article
em Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-414296
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the test-retest reliability and correlations of the light-dark box (LDB).MethodsThe behavior of mice in LDB was recorded twice, for five minutes,with a one-week inter-trial interval.Following parameters were evaluated:latency time for the first entry into the dark area (Latence); percentage of time exploring in the light area ( Ltime% ); percentage of squares crossing in the light area ( Lcross% ); total number of squares crossing ( Cross ); percentage of rears in the light area ( Lrear% ); total number of rears (Rear); total score (Total); transitions between two areas (Transition); and number of fecal boli (Fbi). Subsequently,the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the Kappa agreement coefficient (Kappa) and the Pearson correlation coefficient (Pearson) were calculated for these parameters. Results ①ICC for Lrear% ( ICC =0.5207, P<0.01 ) showed a fair reliability. ②Kappa for all parameters indicated a poor reliability. ③Pearson displayed weak negative correlations between Transition and Ltime% ( Pearson = - 0.4030, P < 0.05; Pearson =- 0. 1490, P> 0. 05 ), Lcross% ( Pearson = - 0. 4331, P > 0. 05; Pearson = - 0.1893, P > 0.05 ), Lrear% ( Pearson = - 0. 4485, P < 0. 05; Pearson = 0. 02845, P > 0. 05 ), however, fair positive correlations between Transition and Cross (Pearson =0. 8603, P<0.01; Pearson =0.6341, P<0. 01 ) ,Rear(Pearson =0.4271, P>0. 05;Pearson = 0. 7245, P < 0. 001 ). Conclusion Rear is found to be stable over time, and indicated a fair reliability.There is a weak negative correlation between Transition and Ltime%, Lcross%, Lrear%, but fair positive correlations between Transition and Cross, Rear.
Texto completo:
1
Índice:
WPRIM
Tipo de estudo:
Prognostic_studies
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
Ano de publicação:
2011
Tipo de documento:
Article