Comparison of the effect of two methods in the treatment for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage / 中国基层医药

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the clinical effect of minimally puncture aspiration therapy with cranial awl hole aspiration thereapy for hypertension cerebral hemorrhage.Methods Sixty-two people were divided into two groups at randomminimally puncture aspiration therapy was used to treat 31 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage,minimally puncture aspiration therapy was guided by CT with YL-1 minimally puncture needle.Cranial awl hole aspiration thereapy was used to 31 patients and was guided by CT.Results The intracranial hemorrage secondary rate was 12.9％,hematoma removal rate was 81.0％.After 3 months of treatment,light defect with neural function was 16 cases(51.6％),severe neurological deficits was 3 cases(9.6％)and moderate defect was 8 cases(25.8％).The intracranial hemorrage secondary rate was 16.1％,hematoma remowal rate was 82.6％,After 3 months of treatment,light defect with neural function was 15 cases(48.4％),severe neurological deficits was 4 cases(12.9％)and moderate defect was 8 cases (25.8％).The hematoma removal rate of minimally puncture aspiration thereapy was similar to cranial awl hole aspiration thereapy,while the intracranial hemorrage secondary rate was lower (x2 =0.412,P =0.324).Conclusion The neural function defence score showed no significant differences.And it' s suitful for patients with poor tolerance.