Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Study on clinical typing of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in patients treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 217-219, 2013.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-434868
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical typing of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in patients treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 333 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who were initially treated in our hospital from 2003 to 2006 ;they had no distant metastasis and received IMRT.These patients were divided into 4 clinical types according to their prognosistype Ⅰ (without local-regional recurrence and without distant metastasis),type Ⅱ (with local-regional recurrence and without distant metastasis),type Ⅲ (without local-regional recurrence and with distant metastasis),and type Ⅳ (with local-regional recurrence and with distant metastasis).Results Of all the patients,70.0% (233) were of type Ⅰ,12.9% (43) of type Ⅱ,16.5% (55) of type Ⅲ,and 0.6% (2) of type Ⅳ.Of 57 patients with stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ nasophayngeal carcinoma,86% (49) were of type Ⅰ,11% (6) of type Ⅱ,4% (2) of type Ⅲ,and 0% (0) of type Ⅳ,and of 276 patients with stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ nasopharyngeal carcinoma,66.7% (184) were of type Ⅰ,13.4% (37) of type Ⅱ,19.2% (53) of type Ⅲ,and 0.7% (2) of type Ⅳ,with significant differences between the two patient groups (P =0.007).Of the 69 patients who received IMRT alone,80% (55) were of type Ⅰ,12% (8) of type Ⅱ,9%(6) of type Ⅲ,and 0% (0) of type Ⅳ; of the 218 patients who received IMRT combined with neoadjuvant plus concurrent chemotherapy,68.8% (150) were of type Ⅰ,13.8% (30) of type Ⅱ,16.5%(36) of type Ⅲ,and 0.9% (2) of type Ⅳ; of the 46 patients who received IMRT combined with neoadjuvant plus adjuvant chemotherapy,61% (28) were of type Ⅰ,11% (5) of type Ⅱ,28% (13) of type Ⅲ,and 0% (0) of type Ⅳ.Conclusions In patients with early and advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma,type Ⅰ is the most common,and type Ⅳ is the least common;type Ⅱ is more frequent than type Ⅲ in early patients,while type Ⅲ is more frequent than type Ⅱ in advanced patients.The percentage of type Ⅰ patients increases,while that of type Ⅱ-Ⅳ patients decreases,as compared with the data of those treated by conventional radiotherapy.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Artigo