Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Analysis of Four Different Operation Methods for Treatment of Complex Upper Ureteral Calculi / 昆明医科大学学报
Journal of Kunming Medical University ; (12): 73-76, 2014.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-445343
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effects of ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL), minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy ( MPCNL) , retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy ( RLU) and open ureterolithotomy (UL) for the treatment of complex upper ureteral calculi. Methods The data of 281 patients with complex upper ureteral calculi from January 2005 to January 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. 48 patients of them received treatment of URL, 113 patients received MPCNL, 67 patients received RLU and other 53 patients received UL. Results Success rates of treatment at the first time wereURL 62.5% (30/48), MPCNL 92.9%(105/113),RLU 100%(67/67) and UL 100%(53/53) . The mean blood losses during the operation wereURL (9.2 ± 1.4) mL,MPCNL (72.5 ± 5.8) mL,RLU (43.1 ± 8.5) mL and UL (100.5 ± 9.2) mL. The average operation time of URL group was shorter than three other groups, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05) . Conclusion Clinical characteristics of patients and individual require ment should be considered comprehensively before an individual treatment choice is made for the treatment of complex upper ureteral calculi.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Journal of Kunming Medical University Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: Journal of Kunming Medical University Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Artigo