Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a meta-analysis of safety and efficiency / 中华泌尿外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the safety and efficiency of retroperitoneal laparoscopic and transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy by meta-analysis.Methods A systematic review of the literature about laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed,searching Medline,Embase,Cochrane library,CBM,CNKI,VIP and Wan Fang database from January 2000 to October 2012.The key words were transperitoneal,retroperitoneal,laparoscopy,radical nephrectomy.Two researchers evaluated the quality of included studies.A meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.0 software.Results Nine controlled clinical studies were concluded,including 1 306 patients (520 in retroperitoneal group and 786 in transperitoneal group).The extracted data were comparable.Meta-analysis results showed that significant difference existed in operative time and complication rate (OR =16.23,95％ CI 1.62,30.84; OR =2.44,95％CI 1.35,4.41) (P＜0.05).It seemed that the retroperitioneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was prior to the transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in those items.There was no significant difference between transperitoneal and retroperitioneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in incision length,estimated blood loss,stay-in hospital,conversion rate,5-year disease-free survival and 5-year overall survival (P＞ 0.05).Conclusions Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy demonstrated significant lower operative time and complication rate than those in transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.However,there is no significant difference in efficacy.Each center can choose a modality according to their convention.