Comparison of susceptibility testing by EUCAST and CLSI broth microdilution methods against Aspergillus isolates / 中国感染与化疗杂志
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
;
(6): 338-343, 2014.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-454892
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the results of susceptibility testing by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)broth microdilution methods against Aspergillus isolates.Methods The susceptibilities of 116 Aspergillus isolates were determined for amphotericin B, voriconazole, itraconazole,caspofungin and micafungin according to EUCAST (E.DEF 9.1 )and CLSI (M38-A2)methods.The essential agreement (EA),categorical agreement (CA),very major errors (VME)and major errors (ME)of the two methods were compared.Results The EA was 96.3%-100% between the two methods.The CA ,ME,and VME were 98.8%,0-1.2% and 0 respectively for the susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus to voriconazole.The CA,ME and VME was 1 00%,0 and 0 respectively for the susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus niger to amphotericin B,or the susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus to itraconazole.Conclusions The results of susceptibility testing by EUCAST and CLSI broth microdilution methods are well consistent against Aspergillus isolates.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Tipo de estudo:
Guia de Prática Clínica
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
Ano de publicação:
2014
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS