Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopic vs Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy; Results of Prospective Randomized Trial
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society ; : 213-218, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-45977
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is more commonly performed than transumbilical single port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA). In this report, we performed a prospective randomized study comparing the outcomes of LA and TUSPLA.

METHODS:

Between April 14, 2009 and June 10, 2009, 40 patients who required laparoscopic appendectomies were randomly selected to receive either a TUSPLA or a LA. None of these patients had perforation or abscess. Twenty of the patients received a LA and the other 20 received a TUSPLA. The clinical outcomes and visual analog pain scores (VAS) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS:

The TUSPLA procedures were performed successfully in every indicated patient. Clinical outcomes were similar in both study groups. The TUSPLA group showed a significantly higher VAS score 24 hours postoperatively than the LA group.

CONCLUSION:

Compared with LA, TUSPLA was technically feasible and safe in patients with non-complicated appendicitis. However, the patients in the TUSPLA group reported more postoperative pain than those in the LA group.
Assuntos

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Apendicectomia / Apendicite / Estudos Prospectivos / Abscesso Tipo de estudo: Ensaio Clínico Controlado / Estudo observacional Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Apendicectomia / Apendicite / Estudos Prospectivos / Abscesso Tipo de estudo: Ensaio Clínico Controlado / Estudo observacional Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Artigo