Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PET/CT Scan in Diagnosing Lung Cancer:A Meta-analysis / 中国医学影像学杂志
Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging ; (12): 50-55, 2015.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-461521
ABSTRACT
Purpose To assess the diagnostic value of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in patients with lung cancer. Materials and Methods Computer-based retrieval was performed on Medline, PubMed, EMbase, Wanfang data, CNKI and the Cochrane Library to search reports on diagnostic value of lung cancer with 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PET/CT scan. The quality of included studies was evaluated according to quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS), and MetaDisc software was adopted to conduct meta-analysis. The pooled specificity, sensitivity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. The heterogeneity was tested. The summary receiving operating characteristic (SROC) curve was drawn, and the areas under the curve (AUC) as well as Q* were measured. Results Ten studies were included. Meta-analysis showed pooled sensitivity was 0.88, pooled specificity was 0.56, DOR was 9.10, AUC was 0.8102, Q*was 0.7448 for FDG group;pooled sensitivity was 0.79, pooled specificity was 0.78, DOR was 12.50, AUC was 0.8440, Q*was 0.7756 for FLT group. Conclusion Both 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT have well diagnostic value for lung cancer, but the specificity of 18F-FLT is higher than that of 18F-FDG in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Tipo de estudo: Estudo diagnóstico / Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Artigo