Meta-analysis for the Efficacy and Safety of Right Ventricular Septum Pacing and Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Chinese Population / 中国循环杂志
Chinese Circulation Journal
;
(12): 766-770, 2015.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-476732
ABSTRACT
database until 2015-01, and all randomized controlled trials (RCT) upon (RVS) pacing and (RVA) pacing in Chinese population were enrolled. According to Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2 quality evaluation criteria, the publications were selected by 2 independent researchers and Meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan5.0 software. Results:
A total of 16 RCT articles including 1199 patients were enrolled in this study. The research was divided into 2 groups RVS group,n=602 and RVA group,n=597. Meta-analysis indicated that the following indexes in RVS group were better than those in RVA group the differences between post-and pre-operation for the combination value in LVEF (MD=1.90, 95% CI 0.75-3.05,P=0.001), stroke volume (MD=7.08, 95% CI 2.39-11.76,P=0.003), QRS wave width (MD=29.13, 95% CI 5.71-52.54,P=0.01), LVESV (MD=2.04, 95% CI -4.22 to 8.31,P0.05.Conclusion:
RVS is a relatively feasible pacing method in Chinese population.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Tipo de estudo:
Ensaio Clínico Controlado
/
Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Circulation Journal
Ano de publicação:
2015
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS