Comparison between autologous blood transfusion drainage and closed-suction drainage/no drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a Meta-analysis / 实用医学杂志
The Journal of Practical Medicine
;
(24): 2545-2550, 2015.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-477642
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the clinical efficiency , safety and potential advantages of autologous blood transfusion (ABT) drains compared with the closed-suction/no drainage. Methods Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBMdisc, CNKI, VIP and WANGFANG were searched comprehensively. The statistical anal-ysis was conducted by using the Cochrane Collaboration review Manager 5.3.5. Results The pooled data of seventeen RCTs including a total of 1 993 patients showed that the patients in the ABT drainage group might benefit from the low rate of blood transfusion [ 16 . 59% and 37 . 47%, OR 0 . 28 ( 0 . 14 ~ 0 . 55 ); 13 . 05% and 16.91%, OR 0.73 (0.47 ~ 1.13), respectively]. The ABT drainage and the closed-suction drainage/no drainage have the similar clinical efficiency and safety length of hospital stay and wound infection on days 3 post-operative haemoglobin. Conclusion This systematic review provides the evidence that the ABT drainage offers a safe and efficient alternative to CS/no drainage with the lowered blood transfusion rate.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Tipo de estudo:
Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
The Journal of Practical Medicine
Ano de publicação:
2015
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS