Comparison of endoscopic stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction / 中华消化内镜杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare surgical gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic stenting in palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction.Methods This retrospective study investigated patients treated for malignant gastric outlet obstruction from January 2007 to January 2014 in the first affiliated hospital of Nanjing Medical University.Endoscopic stenting was placed in 29 patients and surgical gastrojejunostomy was performed in 42 patients.The outcomes assessed included diet scores,time to diet,length of hospital stay,treatments fees and complications.Results Both endoscopic stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy can relieve patients' syndrome with significant higher GOOSS score compared with that before treatment (P ＜0.05),but score improves faster in stenting group.Clinical success for endoscopic stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy was 96.6％ and 92.9％ respectively,and technical success was 100％ for both of them.Endoscopic stenting group was found to have lower early complication rate(3.4％ VS 23.8％,P ＜0.05),higher late complication rate(24.1％ VS 6.9％,P ＜0.05),less time to diet,hospital stay and treatment fees(all P value ＜ 0.05)than surgical gastrojejunostomy group.The major complication after endoscopic stenting is re-obstruction while it is infection and leak of anastomotic site for surgical group.There were no significant differences in complication between two groups (27.6％ VS 11.9％,P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Both endoscopic stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy can relieve patients' syndrome effectively and safely,but endoscopic stenting improves GOOSS scores more rapid with less time to diet,less early complication rate and easy-dealing late complications,also it needs less hospital stay and fees.It's a better choice for patients with less survival expectation.