Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Usefulness of In Vivo and In Vitro Diagnostic Tests in the Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Quinolones and in the Evaluation of Cross-Reactivity: A Comprehensive Study Including the Latest Quinolone Gemifloxacin
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research ; : 347-359, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-49031
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Reports evaluating diagnosis and cross reactivity of quinolone hypersensitivity have revealed contradictory results. Furthermore, there are no reports investigating the cross-reactivity between gemifloxacin (GFX) and the others. We aimed to detect the usefulness of diagnostic tests of hypersensitivity reactions to quinolones and to evaluate the cross reactivity between different quinolones including the latest quinolone GFX.

METHODS:

We studied 54 patients (mean age 42.31±10.39 years; 47 female) with 57 hypersensitivity reactions due to different quinolones and 10 nonatopic quinolone tolerable control subjects. A detailed clinical history, skin test (ST), and single-blind placebo-controlled drug provocation test (SBPCDPT), as well as basophil activation test (BAT) and lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) were performed with the culprit and alternative quinolones including ciprofloxacin (CFX), moxifloxacin (MFX), levofloxacin (LFX), ofloxacin (OFX), and GFX.

RESULTS:

The majority (75.9%) of the patients reported immediate type reactions to various quinolones. The most common culprit drug was CFX (52.6%) and the most common reaction type was urticaria (26.3%). A quarter of the patients (24.1%) reacted to SBPCDPTs, although their STs were negative; while false ST positivity was 3.5% and ST/SBPCDPTs concordance was only 1.8%. Both BAT and LTT were not found useful in quinolone hypersensitivity. Cross-reactivity was primarily observed between LFX and OFX (50.0%), whereas it was the least between MFX and the others, and in GFX hypersensitive patients the degree of cross-reactivity to the other quinolones was 16.7%.

CONCLUSIONS:

These results suggest that STs, BAT, and LTT are not supportive in the diagnosis of a hypersensitivity reaction to quinolone as well as in the prediction of cross-reactivity. Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are necessary to identify both culprit and alternative quinolones.
Assuntos

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Urticária / Basófilos / Técnicas In Vitro / Testes Cutâneos / Ativação Linfocitária / Ofloxacino / Ciprofloxacina / Quinolonas / Diagnóstico / Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina Tipo de estudo: Ensaio Clínico Controlado / Estudo diagnóstico / Estudo prognóstico Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Assunto principal: Urticária / Basófilos / Técnicas In Vitro / Testes Cutâneos / Ativação Linfocitária / Ofloxacino / Ciprofloxacina / Quinolonas / Diagnóstico / Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina Tipo de estudo: Ensaio Clínico Controlado / Estudo diagnóstico / Estudo prognóstico Limite: Humanos Idioma: Inglês Revista: Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Artigo