Clinical value of water exchange colonoscopy / 中华消化内镜杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare sedated water exchange and conventional colonoscopy in the recovery time,rates of reaching ileocecal valve and adenoma detection.Methods A total of 200 newly diagnosed patients undergoing colonoscopy with routine bowel preparation and propofol intravenous anesthesia were randomly divided into 2 groupswater exchange group (WE) and conventional group,100 patients in each group.The operations were performed by two experienced physicians.The recovery time,rates of reaching ileocecal valve and adenoma detection of each group were analyzed and compared after operation.Results The recovery times of patients in water exchange and conventional groups were 8.08±0.58 min and 12.34±0.72 min,respectively (F =2 147.33,P＜ 0.05).Rates of reaching ileocecal valve were 100.00％(100/100,WE group) and 96.00％ (96/100,conventional group),respectively(x2 =4.17,P＜0.05).Adenoma detection rates of whole colon were 43.00％ (43/100,WE group) and 29.00％ (29/100,conventional group) (x2=4.25,P＜0.05),of which small adenomas (＜ 1.0 cm) accounted for 83.96％ (89/106,WE group) and 70.59％ (48/68,conventional group) (x2 =4.43,P ＜ 0.05),respectively.Adenoma detection rates of proximal colon were 28.00％ (28/100,WE group) and 20.00％ (20/100,conventional group) (x2 =1.75,P＞ 0.05),of which small adenomas (＜ 1.0 cm) accounted for 90.41％ (66/73,WE group) and 74.47％ (35/47,conventional group) (x2 =5.45,P ＜ 0.05),respectively.Conclusion Water exchange colonoscopy can not only shorten the recovery time of patients,but also increase rates of reaching ileocecal valve and adenoma detection.