Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparation between lightwand and general laryngoscope application of trachea cannula in cervical spine fracture patients / 临床麻醉学杂志
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology ; (12): 1180-1182, 2016.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-508544
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effect and safety between lightwand and general-laryngo-scope application of trachea cannula in cervical spine fracture patients undergoing general anesthesia. Methods Forty cervical spine fracture patients with tracheal intubation anesthesia were selected,including twenty-eight males and twelve females,aged 18-65 years,ASA physical statusⅡor Ⅲ.These patients were randomly divided into two groups,twenty cases in each group.After anesthesia induction,group L was giv-en general laryngoscope intubation,whereas group C was taken lightwand guided tracheal intubation.The success case of intubation at first,intubation time,adverse reaction of intubation,changes of MAP and HR at intubation and 5 minutes after intubation were observed.Results Compared with group L,success rate of intubation at first was higher (90% vs.60%),intubation time was shorter [(31.3±11.1)s vs.(46.6 ±15.2)s]in group C (P <0.05).The changes of MAP and HR were more stable during intubation in group C compared with group L.Four cases of arrhythmia (20%)occurred in group C,while none in group L.Conclusion Compared with intubation by general laryngoscope,application of tracheal intubation led by lightwand in cervical fracture patients is more effective and safer.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Artigo