Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Four Therapeutic Schemes for Treating Peptic Ulcer Bleeding / 中国药房
China Pharmacy
;
(12)1991.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-519047
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the economic effectiveness of different pharmacotherapeutic schemes for the same disease.METHODS:
Using pharmacoeconomical cost-effectiveness analysis,four therapeutic schemes for treating peptic ulcer bleeding,schemes A,B,C and D,were compared.RESULTS:
The total effect rate of scheme A was the lowest(61.53%).The cost-effectiveness ratios of A,B,C and D were 1.09,10.70,10.74,17.20,respectively.Using sensitivity analysis;the cost-effectiveness ratios were 0.98,9.63,9.66,15.48,respectively.CONCLUSION:
Among the four schemes,scheme C was the best one.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Tipo de estudo:
Avaliação Econômica em Saúde
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
China Pharmacy
Ano de publicação:
1991
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS