Comparison of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and intravenous thrombolysis with urokinase combined with emergency percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction / 中国介入心脏病学杂志
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
;
(4)1996.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-582738
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with urokinase combined with emergency interventional therapy for acute myocardial infarction(AMI). Methods Fifty two patients with first AMI (≤12 h from onset)were randomized to thrombolysis plus PCI group and primary PCI group,the patency rate of infarct related artery (IRA) before intervention,the procedural success rate,the incidence of bleeding complications and acute ischemic events during hospitalization and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by echocardiography before discharge were compared.Results The IRA patency rate in the thrombolysis plus PCI group (61 5%) was significantly higher than that in the primary PCI group (19 2%) ( P 0 05),no major bleeding complication and acute ischemic event occurred during hospitalization in both groups,the LVEF in the thrombolysis plus PCI group (64 3?5 6)% was higher than that in the primary PCI group(54 8?4 9)% before discharge ( P
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Tipo de estudo:
Ensaio Clínico Controlado
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Ano de publicação:
1996
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS