Meta analysis of the clinical outcomes between Minimally invasive internal fixation and open reduction in treatment of calcaneus fracture / 国际外科学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the safety and clinical outcome between minimally invasive internal fixation and open reduction in treatment of calcaneus fracture based on Meta analysis.Methods A computer-based online search of the Cochrane library,Medline database,CNKI,Wan Fang database,the Chinese biomedical literature database,PubMed,Ovid database and all was performed for clinical trials regarding minimally invasive internal fixation and open reduction in treatment of calcaneus fracture.Meta analysis was used to analyze the postoperative local soft tissue,calcaneal last follow-up Bohler angle and Gissane angle.Results A total of 17 studies were included(used Jadad quality grading,one is 7 points,two is 4 points,four is 3 points,ten is 2 points),involving 1138 patients,including 569 patients used minimally invasive internal fixation and 569 used open reduction.Meta analysis showed that the incidence of postoperative local soft tissue poor healing used minimally invasive internal fixation is lower than used open reduction about,the difference was statistically significant [OR =0.26,95％ CI(0.14,0.47),P ＜ 0.01].Meta analysis showed that the calcaneal last follow-up Bohler angle of minimally invasive internal fixation was lower than open reduction,the difference was statistically significant [WMD =-1.29,95％ CI(-2.39,-0.19),P =0.02].There were no statistically significant differences in the calcaneal last follow-up Bohler angle between minimally invasive internal fixation and open reduction[WMD =1.01,95％CI(-3.02,5.04),P =0.62].Conclusions Regardless of the calcaneal fracture type,minimally invasive internal fixation or open reduction,the postoperative Bohler angle and Gissane angle at the calcaneus mechanical recovery characteristics are the same.However,the postoperative soft tissue healing of minimally invasivc internal fixation is less better than open reduction.