Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The comparison of advantages of three-dimensional(3D) and two-dimensional(2D) laparoscope in clinical application / 中国医学装备
China Medical Equipment ; (12): 35-37,38, 2016.
Article em Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-604549
Biblioteca responsável: WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the comparison of advantages of 3D and 2D laparoscope applied in clinical surgery.Methods: 42 cases were received retrospective analysis using 3D and 2D laparoscopic technology to complete abdominal surgery and were divided into 3D group and 2D group according to the methods of surgery. We observed the indexes for operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust, catheter indwelling time, placement time of abdominal cavity drainage tube and postoperative hospitalization days, etc.Results: The two groups of patients completed smoothly laparoscopic surgery. There was no significant difference between 3D and 2D laparoscopic monitoring on indexes in the postoperative exhaust, catheter indwelling time, placement time of abdominal cavity drainage tube and postoperative hospitalization days. But the difference was statistically more significant in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss in 3D than that in 2D group (t=0.358,t=2.455;P<0.05).Conclusion:3D high definition amplification of three-dimensional surgical field similar with the traditional laparotomy is the future trend in the development of minimally invasive surgery. Compared with 2D, 3D technology can improve the overall level of the operation, with the features of easier and faster operation, smaller wound, quicker recovery, less postoperative complications, etc.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Idioma: Zh Revista: China Medical Equipment Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Idioma: Zh Revista: China Medical Equipment Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article