Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in treatment of tubal pregnancy: a meta-analysis / 中国内镜杂志
China Journal of Endoscopy
;
(12): 35-42, 2017.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-612175
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the safety, feasibility and other potential advantages of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for tubal pregnancy. Methods We manually searched Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, web of science, CNKI and China Biology Medicine for the relevant references about comparison of single-port laparoscopic salpingectomy with multi-port laparoscopic salpingectomy in the treatment of tubal pregnancy. The quality of the studies was evaluated, then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. Result Eventually, 2 RCTS and 14 retrospective studies including a total of 1541 cases were identi昀ed. The results of the meta-analysis for LESS versus CLS were as follows a longer operative time [WMD=8.54, 95%CI (2.43, 14.64), P = 0.006], no significant differences in terms of total complications [OR= 0.68, 95%CI (0.27,1.71), P = 0.410]/operative blood loss [WMD = -0.01, 95%CI (-2.51,2.48), P = 0.990]/gastrointestinal function recovery time [WMD = -0.45, 95%CI (-1.72,0.82), P = 0.490], but shorter hospital stay [WMD=-0.40, 95% (-0.75, -0.06), P = 0.020], less postoperative analgesic treatment [OR= 0.38, 95%CI (0.22,0.67), P = 0.000]. Conclusions LESS for surgical treatment of tubal pregnancy is safe and feasible with shorter hospitalstay, less postoperative pain. LESS may therefore be a feasible alternative of CLS in the surgical approach of tubal pregnancy.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo observacional
/
Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
China Journal of Endoscopy
Ano de publicação:
2017
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS