Comparison of surgical site infection between laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer:A Meta-analysis / 中国内镜杂志
China Journal of Endoscopy
;
(12): 46-50, 2016.
Artigo
em Chinês
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-621205
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the differences of surgical site infection (SSI) between laparoscopic distal gas-trectomy (LDG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for gastric cancer. Methods We set up strict inclusion and ex-clusion criteria. All the randomized controlled trials (RCT) on LDG and ODG for gastric cancer were collected. Meta-analysis was performed according to the recommendation by the Cochrane handbook. Results Six RCTs in-cluding 767 patients were analyzed, who were divided into LDG group (n =394) and ODG group ( n=373). Postop-erative wound infection and SSI were significantly lower in LDG than in ODG [RR=0.32, 95 %Cl (0.11, 0.91).P =0.03; RR= 0.28, 95 %Cl (0.12, 0.70),P =0.006]. There was no significant difference in intra-abdominal abscess between the two groups [RR=0.35, 95 % Cl (0.09, 1.31), P=0.12]. Conclusions LDG was associated with a lower incidence of SSI, especially wound infection, as compared with ODG in the meta-analysis.
Texto completo:
DisponíveL
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental)
Tipo de estudo:
Ensaio Clínico Controlado
/
Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas
Idioma:
Chinês
Revista:
China Journal of Endoscopy
Ano de publicação:
2016
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS