Study result of the influence of risk factors in bone setting treatment Colles fracture / Монголын Анагаах Ухаан

ABSTRACT

Introduction Irish surgeon Abraham Coll bone lower forearm Call an end in 1814 reports about the location extension breaks, fractures, called colles fractures. It is common fractures account for 10-20% of the total respectively fracture, the bottom end 75% of bone fracture forearm. Number of elderly patients in developed countries has increased, an increasing number of these refractive growth. In 2001, in the cases of 640,000 fracture United States forearm bone bottom colles. Purpose Study for the influence of risk factors in bone setting treatment Colles fracture Objectives: 1. Forearm bone assessment bottom Colles displaced, some of the causes which affect nondisplaced fractures, depending upon risk factors 2. Forearm bone to assess what the lower end Colles healing some of the risk factors that may affect the fracture Materials and Methods Trauma and Orthopedic research studies involving the term “Emergency Department” at the forearms of 80 people age 5-76 bone treatment in patients who received the peace at the lower end Colles fracture the national center. Respondents grooming, nongrooming divided into 2 groups, which may not be received and confirmed by refractive index difference in X-ray. To analyze the data elements of descriptive statistics was used (mean, standard deviation, percentage distribution). As a result of calculating the difference between the data expressed as a percentage Use Pearson’s chi-squares method. If using T-test method to calculate the difference between the data and the P value less than 0.05 considered statistically accurate. Calculating the relationship between the power of the data evaluated the relationship using spearman correlation coefficient. Result Some of the causes and risk factors are compared between groups, Colles difference nondisplaced fracture purity (r=0.18, p=0.21) or a weak relationship, Colles difference, compared to the nondisplaced fracture the use of calcium supplementation (r=0.21, p=0.06) associations, Colles difference, gender nondisplaced fracture compared (r=0.28, p=0.01) weaknesses related were statistically significant. Conclusion 1. Colles difference nondisplaced fractures when used in alcohol risk factors affect the injury took place, and menopause are diagnosed with osteoporosis, previous calcium intake is associated with weak damage. 2. Colles difference refraction healing has 24-hour loss of time covered detonations often bear physical therapy show his hand and damaged a hospital that affect healing.