Eosinophilic Nonallergic Rhinitis: Clinical Characteristics and Efficacy of Nasal Steroids / 대한이비인후과학회지
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
; : 1162-1166, 2002.
Article
em Ko
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-645805
Biblioteca responsável:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although eosinophilic nonallergic rhinitis (ENR) is a well recognized entity, its clinical features and the response to the treatment have not been definitively elucidated. Authors aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of ENR and the response to the nasal steroids. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A prospective study was conducted for 59 patients diagnosed as ENR at the department of Center between 1994 and 2001. Diagnostic criteria include rhinitis symptoms lasting more than 3 months, nasal eosinophilia, and negative results for allergic skin test or MAST. Patients were treated with nasal steroids for three weeks and compared the pre-treatment and post-treatment symptom scores. RESULTS: Of 59 patients, 25 were males and 34 females. Their age ranged from 6 to 67 years (average : 35 years). Nasal obstruction was most frequently complained by the patients, followed by rhinorrhea, and sneezing. The percentage of nasal secretion eosinophils ranged from 10 to 100% with a mean of 71%. Treatment with topical steroids was effective in 53 patients (90%) to relieve symptoms. CONCLUSION: Unlike allergic rhinitis, ENR commonly develops in the adults with an average age of 31 years. Topical steroid is effective in 90% of patients to relieve rhinitic symptoms. Differential diagnosis of chronic rhinitis using allergic skin test and nasal secretion eosinophils is needed for the adequate treatment.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Índice:
WPRIM
Assunto principal:
Espirro
/
Esteroides
/
Testes Cutâneos
/
Obstrução Nasal
/
Rinite
/
Rinite Vasomotora
/
Estudos Prospectivos
/
Diagnóstico Diferencial
/
Eosinofilia
/
Eosinófilos
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Observational_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
Ko
Revista:
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Ano de publicação:
2002
Tipo de documento:
Article