Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine versus sertraline for Chinese depression patients: a meta-analysis / 中华全科医师杂志
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners ; (6): 50-55, 2018.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-666127
ABSTRACT
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of duloxetine and sertraline for Chinese depression patients.Methods The randomized controlled trials(RCTs)comparing the efficacy and safety of duloxetine and sertraline in the treatment of depression were retrieved from databases and the quality of literature was evaluated.Meta-analysis was performed with the software Revman 5.2.Results Eighteen RCTs involving 1 557 Chinese depression patients were included.The results of Meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in efficacy and cure rate between duloxetine and sertraline groups(OR=1.28, 95%CI0.94 -1.73, P =0.11; OR =1.25,95%CI0.97 -1.62,P =0.09, respectively).The Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD)scores were significantly lower in duloxetine group than those in sertraline group at 1,2 weeks after treatment;however,there were no significant differences at 8-weeks after treatment between duloxetine and sertraline groups.The score of Medical Outcomes Study Pain Measures(MOSPM)in duloxetine group was significantly lower than that in sertraline group(P<0.01). The rate of insomnia in duloxetine group was significantly lower than that in sertraline group(RR=0.57, 95%CI0.32 -1.00, P=0.04).There were no significant differences in other common side reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Duloxetine has similar long term treatment effect as sertraline,but it has a rapid-action profile.Duloxetine is more effective than sertraline in depression with painful physical symptoms;besides,duloxetine is less likely to induce insomnia.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Tipo de estudo: Ensaio Clínico Controlado / Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of General Practitioners Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Tipo de estudo: Ensaio Clínico Controlado / Revisões Sistemáticas Avaliadas Idioma: Chinês Revista: Chinese Journal of General Practitioners Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Artigo