Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison and analysis of the operation approach of esophageal carcinoma / 中国癌症杂志
China Oncology ; (12)1998.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-674776
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To select a better operation approach for esophageal carcinoma.

Methods:

From 1958 to 1997, 945 patients of the middle third esophageal carcinoma of our hospital were underwent 5 types of operation.namely left thoracic approach esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy; right thoractomy anterolateral and abdomen esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy; right thoractomy anterolateral and abdomen and cervical approach esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy; right thoractomy posteriolateral, abdomen and cervical approach esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy; simple right thoracic approach esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy. The rate of resectability, rate of complication, rate of mortality and rate of survival of the 5 types of operation were using SAS package and significance test of contingency table.

Results:

The rate of resectability and the rate of 5 year survival in the five groups were 84.19% and 29.00%, 81.69% and 28.57%,83.65% and 26.19%,90.74% and 34.70%, 93.67% and 39.74%, respectively.

Conclusions:

Right thoracic approach esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy are considered superior the operation approach of esophageal carcinoma.

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: China Oncology Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Artigo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: DisponíveL Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) Idioma: Chinês Revista: China Oncology Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Artigo